Okay, now you’re just being silly. As the Democratic extremists continue to argue against Kavanaugh, and suggest that if this or that was done it might change their position it has reached a point of absurdity. On the bright side, it seems they and their tactics may just make this a mid-term to remember. Six months ago, all the alleged experts were calling for a blue wave where incumbent Republicans would be tossed out and the Democrats would sweep into power to impeach and convict the President, thus removing him from office. It appears that may not be as dramatic as the media would like it to be. In fact, there may be a political red tide in lieu of a blue wave.
Diehards within the activist’s groups in the DNC don’t know how to quit, but the responses to their outrageous behavior are certainly getting easier for those who must confront them.
It seems daily their bad behavior is now displayed even on the most bias of social and public media. It doesn’t matter if it is some guy with a roundhouse kick to knock out some poor pro-life girl with a camera, or the idiots who are yelling out the FBI investigation was incomplete. For the average middle of the road voter, they are now getting a sense of how dangerous it would be to restore power to the extremists who’ve become the face of the Democratic party.
For those complaining the FBI didn’t interview Professor Blasey Ford or subject Judge Kavanaugh to a lie detector test, I offer two simple observations.
a. Professor Ford and her lawyers had over six months to come forward and didn’t. She and her lawyers sought to control and limit her exposure to questioning by the Judiciary Committee where they had every opportunity to lay all their substantiation on the table. They and the minority members chose not to -- believing uncorroborated claims would be enough. Not one Democratic member chose to ask probing questions that would have perhaps filled in some of the corroborations. They chose instead to praise and glorify her victim status since they had already made up their minds. Because of the testimony, there was zero reason for the FBI to interview her, despite the claims by her lawyers she could offer corroborating evidence. It seems interesting a recently retired law professor from UW Madison wrote on her blog today. "There's so little honesty in law and politics. I sometimes feel like retreating from all of it and..."
b. The American Psychological Association[1] says this about Polygraph (lie detector) tests. “Polygraph testing has generated considerable scientific and public controversy. Most psychologists and other scientists agree that there is little basis for the validity of polygraph tests. Courts, including the United States Supreme Court (cf. U.S. v. Scheffer, 1998 in which Dr.'s Saxe's research on polygraph fallibility was cited), have repeatedly rejected the use of polygraph evidence because of its inherent unreliability.” So, any call for the Judge to take a polygraph test is either coming from a useful idiot or would be immediately questioned as bogus if he were exonerated. This call is simply another red herring thrown up by those who don’t want President Trump to win.
I am surprised I haven’t heard how many people will die if he is appointed. Oh wait, I have. Never mind.
Maybe someday, perhaps not in my lifetime but someday, the DNC will actually have good ideas to make America Great and not just resort to ad hominin attacks on those who would like to live in a great country.
No comments:
Post a Comment