There
was an opinion column written by Mr. Jason Whitlock, here, talking about the murder-suicide this past weekend of Ms.
Kasandra Perkins and Mr. Jovan Belcher.
In the column Mr. Whitlock uses this tragic event to condemn the growing
gun violence, the second amendment, and our national tolerance,
noting:
“Our current gun culture simply ensures that more and
more domestic disputes will end in the ultimate tragedy, and that more
convenience-store confrontations over loud music coming from a car will leave
more teenage boys bloodied and dead.”
Let’s be honest, weapons kill
people. Guns, bows and arrows, knives,
brass knuckles, throwing stars, tanks, aircraft, and trebuchets have all been
used to kill. There are solid laws on
the books to outlaw the use of most of these weapons in the commission of a
felony, yet they continue to be used.
Even things that are not intended to be weapons, for example cars, wine bottles, and
bathroom fixtures, have been used in the commission of a murder. When properly used all these items are tools that provide a useful service to society. When placed in the hands of a
criminal, or a troubled mind, they become destructive implements of death or
injury.
The interesting thing about the
current outcry over the need to eliminate the right own a gun, as expressed in
our second amendment, fails completely to address how -- if guns are made
illegal, they would be removed from existence, and if they are not removed from
existence how this prohibition could actually be enforced to eliminate their
use. As I look to history, every time
the government has attempted prohibition it has failed, or took a war to
resolve. First it was slavery in the frontier
states, then the 18th Amendment, and most recently our war on
drugs. Can anyone show me how either of
the last two efforts has resulted in a successful elimination of that product
deemed detrimental to society?
Wouldn’t all the time and effort
taken on condemning these tools be better spent on education of our society on
the proper use and care of them, and on improvements to our ability to diagnose
and treat the self-destructive behavior that leads to their abuse? Wouldn’t gun education and actual training in
firearms safety help impart a more valid respect and understanding than just
telling our kids guns kill and leaving it to the movies to show them how guns
are used?
Like most opponents of the 2nd
Amendment it is easy to condemn, but I’ve yet to hear a practical solution to
putting the Genie back in the bottle, because if you think revoking the 2nd
Amendment will do it, I think you are deluding yourself.
No comments:
Post a Comment