A couple are walking down a
road, hand in hand; all the sudden the driver of a large truck loses
control. The truck swerves back and
forth until it tips over and rolls into the grove of trees. The driver is thrown from the cab and lays
injured alongside the wreckage, fortunately the couple are unhurt and continue
their stroll seemingly oblivious to his injuries.
Are these uncaring heartless
people to leave the poor truck driver injured there? Clearly they must be, but what happens when
the story is told with the actual clarifying details? For example, the couple are walking down a
road in New Hampshire, hand in hand, when all the sudden the driver of a large
truck loses control in West Virginia…
A foolish story you say? Perhaps, but we see it everyday in political
adds. If you take what is said at face
value you will come to the conclusion they want you to, but will it be the
right one? As Bill Clinton says, this election you have a clear choice. The problem with his advertisement is he then
goes on compare apples and tangerines.
He carries on the Democratic Party’s theme of telling people the
Republican’s are only interested in tax breaks for the rich, while President
Obama believes in a strong middle class, as if the two positions are mutually
exclusive.
The choice is much simpler than
that. Do we continue down the path that
has brought us to this point, or do we make a change in leadership that is
within our power? If you believe that a
strong dominating central government that assures you of all the benefits you
seek from it, than by all means you must vote for the President. He promises you what you whatever you want,
but at what cost will it come? Since
borrowing to pay for those promises isn’t a concern; you cannot be upset when
the recession continues as it has, or at some point the government is unable to
actually deliver on those promises.
If, on the contrary, you
believe in the spirit of American initiative and self-reliance and you really
want a government that will stay as unobtrusive as possible. You have an alternative, since they move closer to
it than do the Democrats. They, at
least, argue that we need to move back towards a balanced budget, and higher taxes
slow down the free enterprise system.
The question becomes how do we achieve those goals? And that has not been determined yet, because for the past two years there has been an inability in the White House and
the lower house of the Congress to find room for compromise. A condition that developed from the first two
years of the President’s term where his win at all costs mindset and a
Democratic majority made compromise unnecessary.
Sure, both parties make
promises, but how will the Executive and Legislative Branch’s work
together? We know our current President
does not work with Congress; will Mr. Romney? As a Governor he has shown an ability to do so. But at this time, in this election
it will fall to the rational, independent, middle of the road voter to decide
the fate of this nation. Will we
continue to expand the government to the point all decisions are made by people
inside the Washington Beltway, or will we begin to return decision authority
back to the states and the people?
No comments:
Post a Comment