Our nation is founded on the
principle of free speech, our founding fathers thought it so important to a
healthy Republic it was the first of the Ten Amendments included in the
Constitution after ratification. The exercise
of free speech seems to be a rallying cry for our citizens, unless someone is
saying something you don’t like. Then we
seem to be all for suppressing it, either in the classroom, in politics, or
even in routine life.
When I read about books being
forbidden from the classroom I am emotionally torn about what is right. On one hand I understand a parents right to
influence what their children read, but on the other, I know in my heart that
nothing good comes from forbidding a teenager to explore literature, even if it
is something you find distasteful. A
book, once written and published cannot be undone. The best that can be accomplished by its
censorship is to encourage its sale to people who want to find out what all the
controversy is. That being said there must
be reasonable bounds; for example, the average eleven year old is not
emotionally equipped to read “Silence of the Lambs,” or the “Story of O.”
Today, cloaked in the guise of
political correctness and racial sensitivity, free speech is routinely censored
or condemned. For example, ESPN just
terminated its agreement with Hank Williams Jr. when he expressed his opinion
about our President. As a commercial
entity ESPN was well within its rights to fire an employee, but it does speak
to the whole issue of how our political parties and social media attempt to
control speech in pursuit of their agendas.
So now we come to the protest going
on in Wall Street, and spreading across our country to other business
centers. On one hand people like Nancy Pelosi and the President are encouraging this activity, while the
municipalities are struggling to contain them.
The conservatives see this as a progressive led conspiracy to draw
attention away from the failed politics of the President. Certainly he has laid the basis for these
protests with his whole Us versus Them approach to governing. The fans of this protest are encouraged by
the likes of Michael Moore and the other liberal elites’ who think they know
what is best for the nation.
It strikes me as pure hypocrisy on
the part of the liberal side to say this is a spontaneous uprising, when it has
been shown paid progressive organizers are involved. It is also funny that just two years earlier
they were condemning the Tea Party movement.
But then in politics what you said yesterday shouldn’t really be held
against you. To be fair one of the
interesting observations on conventional Republican politicians they condemned
the Tea Party movement too, until they realized it would probably lead t0 being replaced if they didn’t climb on board.
So for me, I believe the protestors
have a right to be where they are, doing what they are doing, as long as they
don’t endanger public safety. The thing
to keep in mind is most of them don’t really know what they are asking for, for
if we do what they want, they will inherit an anarchy because our government will collapse in on itself.
1 comment:
I'm fine with the protesters too, though the caricature of themselves that they present is a little embarrassing. It's the same Marxist/intellectual claptrap. It's the same dim unawareness of what is actually going on and what would actually help. I think they are a drag on society, but free speech is their right and I would hate to give them a martyr complex beyond the one they already have.
Post a Comment