Can a person be considered compassionate if they hold the lives of plants and animals in higher value than that of human life? If the right to terminate human life is a protected right of the individual than can our society be considered compassionate when we send aid to victims of disaster?
Mankind has waged war on itself since it first walked erect, clearly we have never valued human life to any great extent, but as we like to think we have grown in wisdom and matured as humans wouldn't it be nice if we did?
It seems to me compassion has to start with protection of those unable to speak for themselves and then extend to those less fortunate. I see a clear distinction in my view and that of the current administration on this. I don't see recreating a national welfare class as a compassionate act. Experience has taught that when we grow a generation on welfare entitlements they believe they are owed everything, or they are victims. We cannot let this happen again.
If we are ever to reach true equality in America, each race must see themselves as positive forces capable of moving forward without hate, and showing the other races the respect we show equals. We must find core values we share as a people or we will drift apart. I would hope compassion for life is one of those values.
1 comment:
Good reflection.
Mother Theresa said "the greatest destroyer of peace today is abortion, because it is a war against the child...Any country that accepts abortion is not teaching the people to love, but to use any violence to get what they want." http://tinyurl.com/24das3d
Clearly neither the republicans, nor the democrats have a balanced understanding of compassion. I joke that I am a "papist" (redeeming the word). But I think the Church has a much better stand on issues, because they come from loving as God loves...from a place of true compassion.
Post a Comment