Dilemma – a usually undesirable or
unpleasant choice
Quagmire – a difficult, precarious, or
entrapping position
Well, here we are past the first quarter of this new
administration. An administration
elected by those who were upset with the social changes (both domestically and
internationally), pushed by the previous one.
A President who soundly defeated, although the most ardent opposition
will insist not, all the traditional candidates he faced. His message resonated with a sufficient number
of voters in traditionally Democratic Party controlled states that the
population turned out for him, despite all the flaws dramatized so religiously
by the popular media.
The line of questioning that sticks with me on this
election had little to do with foreign or domestic policy, but was a question
intended to skewer Mr. Trump over his statements the election system was
rigged. When asked if he would accept
the results of the election he did not, as any traditional candidate would,
jump up and say certainly he would. He
said he would have to look at the results and decide. His opponent took the traditional path, a response
apparently not in keeping with her party’s beliefs, or just an outright lie.
As Mr. Trump and the Republicans swept through the
election, like Sherman through Atlanta, the DNC was left as a smoking ruin of
what was once the dominate party in America.
They had a serious decision to make, would they consider why they had
lost the faith of the traditional democratic strongholds, or would they double
down on the agenda that had taken them to this point? In other words, would they move to a more
centrist position or to a more extreme?
With their words and actions since that faithful November day it appears
they have chosen to move to the extreme.
Their opposition has now taken on the appearance of a guerrilla
conflict, where the insurgent knows they cannot confront the opponent directly,
but must delegitimize him in the eyes of the average citizen. Unfortunately, it
seems they are tone deft to the concerns of the average citizen, and their
actions only reinforce the idea Mr. Trump was the lessor of the
two evils presented for voter choice.
With Mr. Trump, they had an opportunity to move a
non-traditional conservative to a more centrist position by working to
compromise his more extreme positions, but that would have required some
compromise on their part. After the past
12 years of government polarization that turned out to be either undesirable or
impossible. So now it will be
interesting to see how they rebuild a party that is far more liberal than the
average voter in the rust belt states.
The party in power traditionally loses seats in the
mid-term election, and the Republican majority seems to be doing everything
they can think of to reinforce the idea they are ill prepared to lead, so 2018
will be an interesting campaign for the DNC.
3 comments:
maybe some foreign powers can get together a broker a peace for us? a two-state solution maybe?
Gino, Hmmm maybe, but we seem to be the country that is always injecting itself into other countries business and trying to define what peace should look like. Maybe Canada and Mexico can sort it out as part of NAFTA.
I saw the Standing Rock Tribe went to the UN so maybe all the tribes could band together and broker some sort of peace treaty. Maybe in Colorado where they have the right herbs for the peace pipe.
Post a Comment