The eighteenth article of amendment to
the Constitution of the United States is hereby repealed.
The transportation or importation into
any state, territory, or possession of the United States for delivery or use
therein of intoxicating liquors, in violation of the laws thereof, is hereby
prohibited.
This article shall be inoperative unless
it shall have been ratified as an amendment to the Constitution by conventions
in the several states, as provided in the Constitution, within seven years from
the date of the submission hereof to the states by the Congress.
And with this simple amendment the nation-wide prohibition
of alcohol ends, and the rights for a state to regulate its sale or use is
returned. Only in place for about 14
years from ratification to repeal the 18th Amendment, as noted
earlier, sparked a whole new industry in the US that did not simply disappear
with its repeal.
Since approval there have been a number of significant
court cases challenging the second section statement about the rights of the
state. These have met with mixed results
as the court has moved first in one direction, and more recently in another. For example, soon after its ratification the
court found a state could write legislation that would favor domestic
production over the importation of other products without running afoul of the Constitution's
commerce clause in Article 1. (e.g. State Board of Equalization v. Young’s
Market Company,1936). More recent
judgements have seen the court move to undercut the broad interpretation of the
1936 decision with positions favoring federal jurisdiction with the commerce
clause holding sway.
Finally, if you’ve been paying attention you will have
noticed the last several amendments carry an interesting last section or
clause. This, to me, seems to be the
mark of a professional law staff now engaged in the writing of the
amendments. Starting with the 18th,
then the 20th, and now the 21st the Congress gave the
states a drop- dead date to get the amendment passed. In each case, they said
“you’ve got seven-years or else
this proposed amendment dies.”
If our founding fathers had used that provision I
wonder if the 27th amendment would have ever seen the light of day, but
that’s for another posting, isn’t it?
No comments:
Post a Comment