A friend
shared this article on Facebook the other day, The Real
War on Science, by John Tierney, writing in the City Journal. Mr. Tierney also writes for the New York Times. I thought about the piece last night and
again this morning. I was tempted to
relate it to other on-going things, but decided instead to give a brief synopsis and let you read his opinion on which philosophical/political side places the biggest
hurdles to the advancement of scientific knowledge. My caveat, I may be a tad guilty of
confirmation bias.
The bottom
line of Mr. Tierney’s piece is the conservative right (i.e. Republicans) have
not had too much impact science. He
notes the role of the government, and how whoever is in power tends to make
political decisions that may shift some research, but his concern is with the
impact of the progressive left (i.e. Democrats) and two particular cultural
aspects the shape modern social research. They are “Confirmation
Bias” and “Groupthink.”
As Mr.
Tierney describes, “the first threat is confirmation bias, the well-documented
tendency of people to seek out and accept information that confirms their
beliefs and prejudices. In a classic study of peer review, 75 psychologists
were asked to referee a paper about the mental health of left-wing student
activists. Some referees saw a version of the paper showing that the student
activists’ mental health was above normal; others saw different data, showing
it to be below normal. Sure enough, the
more liberal referees were more likely to recommend publishing the paper
favorable to the left-wing activists. When the conclusion went the other way,
they quickly found problems with its methodology.”
Mr. Tierney
notes researchers attempt to eliminate confirmation bias by having people with
different opinions review their work.
The problem is academia is a left-leaning institution and many fields
are becoming mono-cultures where this are few, if any, opposing views. As an example, he gives the field of
sociology where Democrats outnumber Republicans at a ratio of 44 to 1. Which leads to the next problem, when
everyone in your peer group thinks as you do the group tends to believe not only
are they right, what they believe must be true.
He believes this Groupthink issue is becoming so wide spread that many
researchers are no longer aware of their own role in it.
I found the
article to be worth reading, if only for self-reflective purposes.
No comments:
Post a Comment