In 1960, the
Presidential election was about passing the torch from the older generation,
i.e. men who were born in the 19th century, to the younger men of
the what is now called “the Greatest Generation.” Much was made of the youth and vigor of these
new candidates. The election of Bill
Clinton marked the passing of the torch to the Baby Boomer Generation. Looking at the Presidential field today,
perhaps it is time to pass leadership once more, but who in Generation X is there
to pick up the torch? Both main parties,
for different reasons, have rejected the younger candidates. Our choices, including Mr. Sanders, have an
average age of 70. If that 3 am phone call Ms. Clinton so famously advertised
in 2008 comes in, who will be awake to answer it? She’s already shown a tendency not to want to
pick up the phone, and would Mr. Trump?
How long
should graduation speeches be? Perhaps
if they were shorter flyover aircraft might make it back to their base.
There is a
difference between acceptance and tolerance.
Nobody wants to be tolerated, everyone wants to be accepted. Perhaps if we understood we all are bias about somethings
and that benign tolerance is okay -- then we might get along just a bit better.
How should
news reporting work? Perhaps if we
eliminated the so called experts brought in to tell us what they think, and
stuck to letting us sort out the facts for ourselves we would understand issues
better. Or perhaps not.
If the
glaciers in the Northern Hemisphere are melting, and the glaciers and ice
fields in the Southern Hemisphere are growing, will the oceans only rise in the
North? Perhaps?
There is a
lot of talk by the Democrats about free college for everyone, and at the same
time the flight of manufacturing to other countries is on-going and encouraged
by the trade deals the various Presidents (both parties), and candidates for
President have supported, e.g. NAFTA and TPP.
So as the economy shrinks and the service industries like food, medical,
legal, governmental, etc. grow. Should an
employee’s compensation be based on the type and number of degrees held, or the
value of that employee to the company? The
interesting thing is there will be far more candidates for the job, than jobs
for the candidates. Is the principle of
supply and demand something that can be ignored? Perhaps not.
No comments:
Post a Comment