There has always been talk
about extending human life. In my
lifetime I’ve seen the mortality rates fall and the average life expectancy
increase significantly for the developed countries. Now I see literature discussing the
possibility of increasing even further so that living to 100 will not be the
exception, but the expectation. I wonder
the cost if we were to achieve this for the few who could afford the path to
this longevity?
We already see the impact of disparity
in wealth, the economic costs of health care, and the increasing the dependency
on the state. We don’t talk much about
the magnitude of impact on the global climate of having 7+ billion humans
hanging around. Instead we blame the problems
on hydrocarbon based fuels, and now our politicians come together to find ways
to make life more expensive as they push agendas that will make the few very rich
at the expense of the many.
As the population swells in the
lessor developed countries, and diminishes in the industrial states, I suspect
the problems we see in America will serve as a model for the issues on a global
scale. Will there remain an expectation the
richest nations pay the poorer nations to help balance the books? But I digress!
So back to my original
question, will this increased life expectancy make the world a better place, or
even make our individual lives better?
For at the end of the day, no matter how long we live, immortality is
achieved not by how long our lives, but how full in terms of impacts on others. Those who’ve made a difference, either good
or bad, have found the only kind of immortality we humans can understand.
No comments:
Post a Comment