Over the past
160 years the speed of communication and its impact has increased
exponentially. In 1854, it would take
weeks for news of an event happening in New York City to reach the west coast of
America. By the end of the civil war we
had reduced that time to hours with the aid of a telegraph, but it was still
measured in a significant number days for the average citizen since it had to
be published in the newspaper and distributed.
Now we know
about a school shooting in Spokane almost as quickly as the local police, and
we can follow the details of this hostage situation, or terror event while it
occurs. We have reached a point in technology where the time for rational
thought and reflection has been eliminated and pure emotional response becomes
the norm.
One hundred years, or even 50 years ago, it was the role of the editor to determine what was worthy of being classified as news and how to structure the story to hopefully support a logical understanding. Today we see that the communication industry no longer serves that purpose and is principally focused on volume, (i.e. filling available time), and perhaps supporting some political agenda.
So it now
falls to us to make the choices once made for us. We have to absorb the vast amount of
information, and somehow make sense of it to reach a logical conclusion. The question is, can we or do we allow others
to make those choices as they have historically done? Since we are all receiving the same
information at the same time, do we really think the talking heads on the media
outlets hold the same insights we’ve always assumed?
As you watch
the news, understand you are the adult, not the media. Make good choices in your approach to
understanding.
No comments:
Post a Comment