I would like
to believe I am consistent in my views, although if I am always so, then they
could never evolve. I wonder how many of
us find that consistency is the most important thing, and once formed an
opinion cannot be changed. Is that a problem
we have today?
There is a
difference between training and education.
We send our young off to be educated, but educators it seems, for the
most part, have become singular in their beliefs and foster a one sided view of
a subject, not encouraging our young to see both sides of an issue, and thereby
know that there is room for disagreement and debate. Coming from this education a child always set
out to build a better world in the image of the mentors, but how are they
taught to question and decide for themselves?
At one point in my life I taught air navigation to new students. Each of us understood we were trainers and
not educators. The difference? We were
teaching a skill, not opening a mind to think and develop its own ideas. It appears to me that educators of today may
have closed their minds and see themselves as trainers rather than what they should
be, people who help the young to think for themselves. It would be nice to see some different consistency in
education.
That society
changes is, I think, an absolute. Each
generation builds and expands on the progress made by their parents, sometimes
for the better, sometimes not. For
example, my parents were children of the depression and were shaped by those
experiences. They were focused on
providing for the family, were not afraid to use a belt to discipline, and took
complete responsibility for their work.
Well kind of, since the family was a bit dysfunctional, and my father
was an alcoholic, there were some deviations to the stereotype family. What I saw in my upbringing was a lack of
consistency. One day my father would say
one thing, the next there would be regret and he would say or do something completely
different.
From the
lesson’s of my youth I attempted to be a different (and by inference better)
parent. At the same time I was not
opposed to occasionally employing corporal punishment when I thought it
necessary. I still believe this may, in
some cases, be warranted, but clearly I am in a minority and I suspect the use of “time-outs” is viewed as the current "Best Way." This doesn’t mean I am right; in fact I
probably am not. Will my grand children
grow up to understand their roles in society and be productive because of time outs? Only time will tell. But one thing I am absolutely certain of is
that a parent must be consistent. If he
or she tells a child that something will happen, it has to be done just as the
parent says it will. Children need structure
and in that structure find the confidence to grow.
So at the end
of the day I return to the central question is being consistent in your beliefs
a good thing or does it box you into only seeing one side of a problem? When should we strive for consistency and when must we abandon it?
“A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of
little minds, adored by little statesmen and philosophers and divines.” Ralph
Waldo Emerson
1 comment:
My core belief and true values are consistent. This does not mean that I can't see pros and cons in issues as they come along. I tend to see life in commons sense terms and many times commons sense swings both ways, left and right or sometimes in the middle.
Hard core believers in any one direction scare the heck out of me!
As to my research in GMOs and the information I've made available, you asked if I could post this on my bog. I could, however it would be very time consuming since I have to transform each page (33 pages) into individual JPEG images in order to upload into Blogger. I've invested much time in this research already and will gladly e-mail this to anyone who is interested in the GMO foods that we ingest daily without our knowledge.
Post a Comment