A simple
question, does government welfare benefit individuals so they can improve their
lives and gain independence and success, or does it just create a new class of
people who now, like children, become dependent on the whims of the state?
In the
1930’s Franklin Delano Roosevelt, directing the Government as it dealt with
the depression following the stock market crash of 1929, said this in his 1935
State of the Union address.
“We have undertaken a new order of things; yet we progress to it
under the framework and in the spirit and intent of the American Constitution.
We have proceeded throughout the Nation a measurable distance on the road
toward this new order….We find our population suffering from old inequalities,
little changed by vast sporadic remedies. In spite of our efforts and in spite
of our talk, we have not weeded out the over privileged and we have not
effectively lifted up the underprivileged. Both of these manifestations of
injustice have retarded happiness. No wise man has any intention of destroying
what is known as the profit motive; because by the profit motive we mean the
right by work to earn a decent livelihood for ourselves and for our families.
We have, however, a clear mandate from
the people, that Americans must forswear that conception of the acquisition of
wealth which, through excessive profits, creates undue private power over
private affairs and, to our misfortune, over public affairs as well. In
building toward this end we do not destroy ambition, nor do we seek to divide
our wealth into equal shares on stated occasions. We continue to recognize the
greater ability of some to earn more than others. But we do assert that the
ambition of the individual to obtain for him and his a proper security, a
reasonable leisure, and a decent living throughout life, is an ambition to be
preferred to the appetite for great wealth and great power.”
The President, just as we see today, lays out a grand plan
to reshape the financial structure of the country and in so doing redistribute
the wealth and provide all with an appropriate share. He outlines the public works programs to
provide government funded work for the unemployed, and sets the framework for
the social security program that would be enacted later that year. Did these programs bring America out of the
depression, and can we expect to see similar programs bring us out of today’s
depression? I don’t know the answer, but
I wander from my original question. Do
these social engineering efforts lead to happier, more fulfilled individuals
who contribute to the success of a democracy, or do they lead to something
else?
Perceptions of Self-Esteem in a
Welfare-To-Wellness-To-Work Program is an extract of a research project to assess a program to
help welfare recipients with their self-esteem and mental health. It has a very small sample size to draw its conclusions;
never the less it says that the program they were studying improved a participant’s
self-esteem. That is not so unusual, but
the some of the other data is striking, in this sample they suggest poor
self-esteem prevents many low-income families from ever leaving the
program. Mental health and drug
dependency issues are also contributors to long-term welfare dependency.
There are numerous studies that
speak to the penalty one pays from a perspective of their personal self-worth,
so what is the answer? Do we benefit the individual with government welfare or
do we just prolong the suffering?
2 comments:
I too am wandering from your original question...I find it stunning that FDR said "weed out" regarding people, regarding citizens...maybe he needed the word about leaving the tares amongst us so that the young wheat would not be damaged and then the sorting is clear at harvest time.
How many therapists does it take to change a lightbulb? Just one...but the lightbulb really has to WANT to change....maybe that holds true for other descriptors...
Post a Comment