Just before
Christmas, a leading Republican Presidential candidate was handed a lump of
coal for his stocking when the Virginia Republican party announced he, and
several others, had failed to submit the prerequisite number of valid
signatures to secure a place on the ballot.
The required number was 10,000 registered Republican voters. Mr. Gingrich submitted something like 11,050
names but not all were registered as Republican voters and those were thrown
out.
Since then
there has been a broad frontal attack that a) Virginia’s primary is “a failed
system” when it excludes a front runner from being the ballot, b) he would
pursue a write-in campaign. Today he,
and his campaign manager, is comparing this setback to the Japanese attack on
Pearl Harbor. To that I have but one
thing to say – Phooey.
The attack
on Pearl Harbor was on one side a brilliant military operation executed with
precision, and from a US standpoint a failure in our intelligence community and
government to anticipate correctly where or when Japan would initiate
hostilities. Those failures cost over
2,000+ American lives. The Gingrich
campaign’s failure to get on the ballot was plain and simple a failure in the
campaign and for that the fault must lie solely with the Candidate. There was no opposing unforeseeable brilliance
that stopped him. Yet I don’t see a lot
of acceptance of failure on the campaigns part.
The campaign
must have access to a statistician, don’t they?
Surely someone would know what the probable rejection rate on petition
signatures would be? Wouldn’t a prudent
campaign look to eliminate that risk by submitting enough signatures to account
for that? Ron Paul and Mitt Romney
seemed to have broken the code on what was required.
If you and
your campaign are not smart enough to figure out the rules of the game and then
meet or exceed the minimum requirements are you really smart enough to be
President?
Update: Today (12/29/11) The candidate's story is one of his workers, paid to get signatures, committed fraud. Now he's just another victim.
Update: Today (12/29/11) The candidate's story is one of his workers, paid to get signatures, committed fraud. Now he's just another victim.
2 comments:
he not only didnt pick good staff, he didnt pick good staff twice.
his first staff abandone him for perry when perry entered the race. guess who else didnt make the ballot in VA? LOL
let me alter that, i think i got the state wrong, but perry missed one just same, with newt.s fisrt team.
Post a Comment