Saturday, January 30, 2016

Thoughts on a Saturday

The other day I saw a posting from a casual friend on Facebook, (thanks Mark). It said, “Faced with the choice between changing one’s mind and proving that there is no need to do so, almost everyone gets busy on the proof.” — John Kenneth Galbraith

It got me to thinking about the social media dialogues I am routinely exposed to.  Generally, it begins with the posting of someone else’s meme and my questioning it.  I accept that memes are intended solely as propaganda for one side or another, but there are times the lies and half-truths contained in them are so outrageous I feel compelled to comment.  This rarely has any affect on the poster of the meme.  In fact, the internet has developed new words for people who challenge or comment on the legitimacy of a position.   So most of the time I either ignore the stupidity of the post or hide it so I don’t have to be bombarded with the absurdity others feel compelled to push in front of me.

So now we come full swing into this election season, and those memes will only increase.  After a full year of the media hyping or slamming every candidate, and the political junkies besmirching or glorifying their particular targets, I have to believe almost everyone has made up their mind about who they love or despise.  There are those who either love or despise the current administration so much they are willing to cast their lot with an old, rich, white candidate of questionable integrity and judgement (as far as I know each party has a least one of these).  Then there are those who wish to move further to whatever side they currently are on and buy into the promises of those who would pander to them. Finally, there are those who question the process by which we choose our candidates and would long for a return to a time where we were no obligated to demonize those we disagree with politically, and were able to find candidates who would be truthful and be able to explain the role of the President without promising beyond their ability to deliver.  Unfortunately, being truthful does not get a candidate many votes, because we are all greedy and want to increase our share of the pie and the only way to achieve that this through the election.

So here are a few thoughts for those who love the promises of Mr. Sanders.  If everyone has a college degree, then what will separate those in well paying positions and those who work at Freddie’s Fish Fillet Funhouse?  Will it be the prestige of the University like it is today? Next, if we allow unlimited emigration to the US, and all the jobs that must be done, like garbage collection, home construction, road work and landscaping go to these individuals where will the typical citizen with a degree from Harvey’s College of Liberal Arts and Social Philosophy work?  Or will they be supported by the state as civil servants and allowed to think great thoughts for a living?  Finally, how much will this all cost the middle class, who regardless of the promises to tax the rich, will bear the bunt of the economic burden just through the shear number of people in that group?

On the other side of the coin, for those who love the promises of Mr. Trump just one simple question. What in his history, statements, and demeanor suggests he would be able to accomplish anything he says when he blusters his way through the roll of President?  Although we have moved significantly towards making the Office of President one where he or she can be an autocrat; the power of the purse still rests with Congress.  Finally, do you really think his interest is in the welfare of the middle class?  If he saw a deal that would increase his fortune would he really put the interest of the nation before self-interest?

There are certain fundamental issues Mr. Trump has touched on that the left seems reluctant to address and unfortunately their supporters seem to care little about.  One of those issues is with foreign trade agreements.  We seem to love entering into these things, but what has it gotten us so far?  Did NAFTA create new work for our middle class or did it allow American companies to move jobs out of the country?  In the end you have to ask yourself, who did NAFTA benefit, the ordinary citizen or the rich who fund both parties?

Well that is enough rambling for today.  Time to get busy with real work.

Tuesday, January 19, 2016


I am pretty regularly amazed by society and human nature.  How someone can at one moment be outraged at how others seem to have no respect for people and will then turn around and lambast someone they don’t like.  Perhaps it is true that conversation would cease to exist if we can’t … ah what the heck.

Sunday, January 3, 2016

It Would Be Nice!

It would be nice if life were perfect, but it isn’t.  If we could eliminate bullying, disrespect, abuse, envy, hate, intolerance, prejudice, and deception it would be nice.  Unfortunately, the question most focus on is how can we fix the government to eliminate them, not how should we change ourselves? 

As long as most people believe it is the government’s job to fix these things we won’t, for they are morality based issues and our government, no matter how willing the politicians may be, will never be effective at establishing a set of moral codes that can be universally applied.  The founding fathers recognized this and codified it in the very first amendment to the basic Constitution.

As society moves forward with programs that increase government dependence, undermine the ideals of family, and perpetuate acceptance of the idea due to some societal variance individuals are not responsible for their actions we are condemning ourselves.

It would be nice if we could make life perfect, but we can’t.  The only thing we can do is eliminate the problems in ourselves and teach our children.  Those willing to teach their children seem to be fewer each year.
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...